Staying ahead in today’s insurance marketplace requires sharp insights and the right tools. The 2026 State of the Markets at a Glance deliver insights into key industry trends, emerging risks, and actionable intelligence to help you navigate the marketplace with confidence. Whether you’re assessing market shifts, identifying new opportunities, or fine-tuning your strategy, our latest insights ensure you stay informed and prepared for what is ahead.
KEY MARKETPLACE ISSUES
The E&S casualty market in 2026 is best described as fragmented, rather than uniformly hard or soft. Market conditions vary significantly by class of business, industry segment, and individual risk profile. Across all casualty segments, claims history and venue remain the primary drivers of underwriting outcomes. Accounts with clean loss experience and favorable jurisdictions are benefiting most from increased competition, while risks with adverse claims activity or exposure to challenging venues continue to face firm pricing, higher attachment points, and heightened underwriting scrutiny. In this environment, the narrative surrounding an account, including risk controls, contractual risk transfer, and severity management is often as influential as the underlying exposure itself.
Over the past 18 to 24 months, capital dynamics have shifted meaningfully. Softening conditions in the property market have released capital, including reinsurance capacity, that is now flowing into the casualty space. At the same time, strong underwriting results and sustained rate adequacy in casualty lines have attracted increased investor interest. While these forces have created ample overall capacity, the deployment of that capital remains uneven across classes and accounts.
A notable byproduct of these dynamics has been the continued expansion of third-party MGAs operating on carrier paper. Many ofthese platforms are growth-oriented and benefit from the absence of legacy loss portfolios, enabling them to compete aggressively on pricing, limits, and structure. This has introduced greater variability into the casualty marketplace, with newer entrants at times undercutting traditional carriers that remain constrained by historical loss development and long-tail exposure considerations.
AGRICULTURE
The agriculture casualty market remains a distinctly challenging sector in 2026. At the primary and low excess levels, capacity remains constrained. Many agricultural programs include specialized endorsements and blended commercial–personal exposures that not all carriers are willing or able to accommodate, particularly within the lead $10M layer. As a result, fewer carriers are prepared to both lead and follow these terms, creating a selective marketplace at the lower levels of the tower. This environment places a premium on well-constructed submissions, supported by a clear narrative, detailed vehicle maintenance and fleet schedules, defined radius of operations, and documented seasonal shut-down periods to help differentiate risk and improve underwriting outcomes.
A number of agriculture-focused markets non-renewed business in 2025, and historically it can take several years before carriers re-enter after pulling back. Admitted market exits have been largely driven by climate and weather related losses, with convective storm activity, including tornadoes and severe hail, emerging as a greater concern than coastal wind, particularly in London markets. In addition, several farm mutuals have exited the market in recent years after prolonged underpricing, as loss experience has caught up with prior pricing models.
Admitted carriers are likely to continue exiting unprofitable accounts, those with multiple losses, and risks located inwildfire-prone areas or Midwestern regions within Tornado Alley. Accounts with loss history beyond one or two minor events face increasing non-renewal pressure, creating opportunities for flexible markets willing to adjust pricing, deductibles, and structure to reflect true exposure.
Above $10M, excess capacity begins to expand modestly, and competition improves slightly compared to the working layers. However, overall market dynamics remain heavily influenced by auto fleet exposure, which continues to be the primary driver of underwriting scrutiny and rate pressure. Underwriters are placing increased emphasis on operational controls, fleet management practices, and loss prevention measures when evaluating agricultural risks.
Rate increases persist on accounts with fleet exposure, regardless of size. That said, placements requiring only a single carrier, such as standalone general liability or a $1–$2M lead umbrella, remain competitive. Conversely, larger umbrella placements in the $10–$15M range typically require multiple participating carriers. In these layered programs, reduced competition results in sustained rate pressure throughout the tower, as all markets must align on pricing and structure.
The definition of the “working layer” has continued to shift. Loss severity concerns have pushed what was historicallyconsidered a $5M working layer up to $15–$20M on many agricultural risks. While rate pressure remains concentrated in these layers, some softening is beginning to emerge above the working layer, even on fleet-driven accounts, marking a departure from prior years when rate increases were applied uniformly across the entire tower.
CANNABIS
The cannabis insurance market continues to expand, but the casualty landscape remains complex and differentiated by line. General liability has softened modestly with increased competition, leading to rate reductions of roughly 7–12%, though carriers remain cautious around slip-and-fall and premises risk without strong safety and surveillance protocols. Product liability continues to be a high-hazard casualty exposure, with claims around contamination and mislabeling up and premiums rising approximately 10–15%; capacity is stable but selective, favoring manufacturers with robust quality controls.
Towards the end of 2025, the federal government signaled a shift in rescheduling marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III. Such a shift could reduce tax obligations and improve operating margins, allowing businesses to scale faster. However, compliance complexity and state-by-state regulation would remain. As cannabis continues to expand, it is possible this will attract more attention from regulatory bodies and plaintiff attorneys.
Given the evolving landscape and complex legalization framework, engaging a broker with dedicated cannabisknowledge is essential to effectively navigate these diverse casualty exposures and secure coverage terms that reflect the changing risk profile.
COMMERCIAL AUTO
The commercial auto market continues to operate in a challenging environment. Depressed freight rates have driven increased marketing activity as insureds respond to prior rate increases, resulting in elevated submission volumes. At the same time, heightened regulatory and underwriting scrutiny, particularly around non-U.S.-domiciled drivers, has added complexity for insureds and made it more difficult for some operators to attract and retain qualified drivers.
Loss severity remains a primary concern, with nuclear verdicts continuing to influence underwriting and pricingdecisions. Auto and trucking claims remain a leading driver of large non-economic and punitive damage awards, while rising auto physical damage costs further pressure loss ratios and reinforce the need for disciplined underwriting and proactive risk management.
Underwriting expectations continue to tighten, particularly in the trucking sector, where telematics data is increasingly required as part of the quoting process. Standard business auto markets are non-renewing at a higher rate, driving greater reliance on E&S monoline auto solutions, especially for insureds operating light PPT units. Excess auto capacity continues to contract, resulting in higher pricing and more layered placements.
Hired and Non-Owned Auto (HNOA) remains an area of increased focus, with submission flow and in-force policycounts rising as both standard and wholesale auto markets restrict coverage within owned auto policies. General liability carriers are also limiting HNOA endorsements, often aggregating coverage within the GL policy when offered. Claims activity remains a concern, and partner carriers continue to push single-digit rate increases for clean accounts, underscoring the importance of standalone HNOA solutions across a broad range of industries. Against this backdrop, CRC’s standalone HNOA program, active in the market for more than 20 years, continues to provide a stable, reliablesolution as a trusted partner for this increasingly constrained coverage.
CONSTRUCTION
In 2026, admitted and retail-direct carriers continue to view well-managed commercial construction risks as attractive, resulting in flat to modest rate reductions on many primary general liability renewals. That said, rate relief is not uniform and often requires active marketing, with competition playing a key role in securing improved terms.
Conditions can vary significantly by state and segment. Certain jurisdictions, including Florida and New York, remain outliers, where fewer carriers are willing to participate, particularly on the practice policy side for small to middle market accounts. In these states, pricing can vary widely, and meaningful primary reductions are increasingly difficult to achieve without introducing a new carrier into the program. Across the small to middle market, primary construction pricing is generally flat to up 5%, with some states experiencing higher increases due to capacity constraints and loss experience.
Excess casualty remains under greater pressure, with many programs seeing 5–15% increases, particularly where auto and/or severe bodily injury worksite exposures are significant drivers. Lead excess capacity, especially in the lead $5M layer, continues to tighten, with carriers shortening limits and requiring more layered structures. Programs that once supported larger lead limits for standard construction risks are increasingly being broken into multiple layers, a trend expected to accelerate through 2026.
This shift is especially evident in fleet-driven risks. Fleet sizes that historically could be supported with broader leadexcess placements are now triggering more conservative structures at lower thresholds. Where it was once common to restructure programs only at higher fleet counts, similar approaches are now being applied to smaller fleets, reflecting heightened sensitivity to severity and social inflation.
Carriers are likely to maintain disciplined underwriting and cautious deployment of limits, even as competition improves in select segments. Agents and insureds should anticipate continued layering, limit management, and state-specific strategies as key components of successful construction casualty placements in 2026.
ENERGY
In 2026, the energy casualty market is showing increased competitiveness at the primary level, particularly for general liability and, to a lesser extent, primary auto. Select admitted carriers are re-entering the space for well-performing risks, supported by improved loss performance in certain oil and gas segments following several years of flat to negative results. While primary capacity has expanded, carriers remain disciplined in limit deployment, with leadlimits generally shorter than in prior cycles and excess capacity more constrained.
Segment performance varies across the energy value chain. Upstream operators continue to experience primary rateincreases of approximately 5–10%, with excess layers pushing 10–15% as carriers attempt to offset social inflation and nuclear verdict exposure, particularly for accounts with large auto fleets. Contractors and ancillary supply risks are closer to flat, and larger operators with strong loss histories may see flat renewals or modest relief where exposure growth is meaningful. Excess capacity remains available, though placements increasingly require more participating markets as carriers limit per-risk deployments.
Midstream risks are facing greater pricing pressure due to aging infrastructure and unfavorable loss experience,with higher rate increases becoming more common. Underwriters are placing increased emphasis on technological advancements and risk mitigation strategies to improve profitability. Downstream risks are seeing renewed competition, with flat to nominal pricing available for preferred accounts, though underwriting remains selective, and capacity is deployed conservatively.
Excess and umbrella rate increases have moderated overall, shifting to single to low double-digit increases. However, outcomes remain highly dependent on loss history and auto exposure, which continues to drive attachment points and limit availability. Regional dynamics remain uneven across the Gulf Coast, with Louisiana auto rates slowing while Texas continues to trend upward.
Within Operators Extra Expense (OEE), control of well remains a key challenge. Domestic capacity continues to diminish, leaving London markets as the primary source of coverage. Pricing remains inconsistent, with pressure building toward greater rate normalization.
ENVIRONMENTAL
In 2026, the environmental and pollution liability insurance marketplace remains one of the more stable segments within the casualty market, demonstrating resilience amid increasing regulatory scrutiny and evolving risk profiles. Overall market conditions remain competitive, with ample capacity available across most product lines. However, consistent with broader casualty market trends, early signs of constraint are emerging in excess environmental placements and combined auto-related products, where underwriting appetite is tightening.
With more than 70 carriers actively offering environmental insurance products, alongside the continued expansionof MGUs, MGAs, and select carriers pursuing direct-to-retail distribution models, access to capacity remains strong. Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL) and combined-form placements continue to be competitive across most classes. This breadth of participation is expected to keep pricing generally stable, with modest upward pressure in certain segments as capacity becomes more selective. While pricing has remained relatively consistent, coverage terms and conditions are not always unchanged, reinforcing the importance of careful policy review.
Key market trends include heightened focus on emerging contaminants such as PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkylsubstances) and ethylene oxide (EtO). Underwriters are applying increased scrutiny to PFAS exposure, site-specific loss history, and contractual risk transfer obligations, which can influence both capacity deployment and coverage structure. These exposures are driving underwriting caution, capacity constraints, and the need for more creative, broker-led solutions, particularly for risks involving so-called “forever chemicals.” At the same time, product innovation continues, with increased adoption of integrated coverage solutions. Insureds are steadily transitioning fromstandalone CPL policies to combined Professional Liability/Pollution Liability (PL/CPL) structures. The market is also seeing broader incorporation of GL and auto coverage for environmentally adjacent operations, reflecting both growth opportunities and stricter underwriting for risks with large fleets or excess auto exposure.
Macroeconomic factors are also influencing environmental insurance demand. With GDP growth projections in the 4–6% range for 2026, increased activity is expected in energy infrastructure and transition projects, driving demand for combined project pollution and professional liability solutions. In parallel, interest rate conditions are supportingrenewed transactional activity in the real estate sector, reinforcing the need for robust Site Pollution Legal Liability coverage to facilitate acquisitions and redevelopment of historically contaminated properties.
Against this backdrop, the environmental wholesale brokerage landscape is undergoing its own transition. As many senior practitioners who helped establish the pollution insurance market approach retirement, demand for environmental coverage continues to grow, driven by advances in scientific detection, heightened regulatory enforcement, and expanding exposure awareness. In an increasingly complex and evolving marketplace with more product options than ever before, it is critical for retailers and insureds to partner with specialized environmental wholesale teams. Deep market tenure, broad carrier access, and experienced placement strategy are essential to navigating coverage structure, capacity deployment, and long-term risk management effectively.
HOSPITALITY – RESTAURANTS + BARS
The casualty market for bars and restaurants remains firm to moderately hard, with conditions varying widely by venue type, geography, and alcohol exposure. Accounts with significant liquor sales, late-night hours, high crowd density, or entertainment components continue to face the most challenging terms, while higher-end establishments generally benefit from more competitive pricing and broader market interest.
Liquor liability remains one of the most difficult exposures to place, particularly in states such as South Carolina, Alabama, and Washington, D.C., where capacity is limited and pricing remains elevated due to ongoing dram shop litigation, social inflation, and nuclear verdict trends. Assault and Battery coverage is frequently excluded or heavily sub-limited,especially for nightclubs and late-night bars, and some programs only offer highly restrictive coverage terms.
Market consistency remains limited given the broad spectrum of hospitality risks. Higher-hazard venues remain the most expensive and capacity-constrained, while middle-of-the-road restaurant accounts are beginning to re-emerge on the wholesale side. More recently, the landscape for true restaurants with less than 30% liquor sales has begun to shift, with several new carriers entering the segment and offering more competitive options. Some of these markets areagent-direct, while others are structured through program business, introducing additional placement pathways and the potential for improved pricing dynamics going forward.
Underwriters continue to demand detailed risk management documentation, including alcohol service training, IDverification, security protocols, and incident reporting. Early, well-developed submissions and segmented placement strategies remain critical, with layered placements and E&S-supported umbrella and excess solutions often required as higher retentions and disciplined underwriting remain the norm.
HOSPITALITY – HOTELS + MOTELS
Casualty conditions for hotels and motels remain firm, driven by a broad range of guest-facing liability exposures and ongoing social inflation pressures. Underwriters continue to focus on guest injuries, pool and patio areas, elevators and escalators, valet and hired auto operations, and staffing-related risks, all of which influence pricing, capacity, and program structure.
While capacity is generally more stable than in liquor-forward hospitality classes, admitted markets have reduced limits and narrowed coverage, increasing reliance on excess placements. Standard market capacity continues to contract, with programs that previously supported $15M to $25M in total limits now more commonly capped at $10M to $15M. As a result, excess towers remain achievable but increasingly require layered structures and may only attract selective market participation. Notably, while carriers are not increasing capacity, more competitive pricing hasemerged in excess layers attaching above $5M, where rate decreases can be found despite overall market discipline.
Human trafficking and sexual abuse liability have become material underwriting considerations, with many standardmarkets pulling back and requiring documented anti-trafficking policies, employee training, and response procedures. Assault and Battery exposures are also under heightened scrutiny, particularly for hotels with bars, lounges, or nightlife components, often resulting in sub-limits or exclusions. Despite these pressures, General Liability (GL) placements remain achievable for hotels with prior loss activity or more challenging operations, provided risk controls are well documented. Accounts that demonstrate strong guest safety protocols, clear operational oversight, and a clear separation between lodging and alcohol-related exposures are best positioned to secure favorable terms in anotherwise disciplined market.
LIFE SCIENCES
The life sciences casualty market in 2026 is increasingly competitive, supported by abundant capacity and continued new market entrants. As a result, pricing is generally flat to modestly decreasing, with many well-managed risks achieving flat renewals or low single-digit rate reductions. Product liability and professional liability premiums are generally flat to down 5%. Meanwhile, the broader commercial and casualty markets are also beginning to moderate,with some carriers extending rate reductions to certain life sciences exposures.
Capacity remains robust across the sector, particularly within specialty, digital health, and life sciences placements, driving competition and broader underwriting flexibility. Appetite continues to be nuanced and differentiated by an insured’s role within the product development and manufacturing chain. Contract manufacturers remain favorably viewed, while compounding pharmacies face increased underwriting scrutiny amid heightened counterparty risk concerns. Meanwhile, the rapid expansion of telehealth and connected health technologies has increased demand and appetite for digital health risks, supported by the introduction of more tailored policy forms.
Despite improving market conditions, underwriters remain focused on key risk and claims drivers. Social inflation,nuclear verdicts, and litigation funding continue to influence claim severity and potential for class action lawsuits. GLP-1 receptor agonists remain an underwriting focal point, particularly around aggregate limit management, while exposures related to cybersecurity, clinical trials, and telehealth professional liability continue to evolve alongside the sector.
PRODUCTS LIABILITY
The products liability market remains competitive, with a relatively deep pool of participating carriers across many risk profiles. On well-performing accounts, it is common to see five or more markets competing on a single placement, contributing to increased options and continued pressure on minimum premiums.
However, market conditions vary significantly by product class. Higher-hazard products, including tires, batteries, gun-related items, and e-bikes, remain challenging to place, with limited carrier appetite and heightened underwriting scrutiny. In these segments, capacity is opportunistic, pricing remains firm, and coverage terms are often more restrictive. Carriers continue to closely evaluate loss history, product design, distribution channels, and quality control practices.
Overall, while the broader products liability market offers competitive dynamics for standard risks, difficult classes continue to require specialized market knowledge, strong underwriting narratives, and creative structuring to successfully secure coverage.
PRODUCT RECALL + CONTAMINATION
Pricing and terms in the product recall market remain competitive as the sector continues to operate in a soft cycle. Capacity remains abundant, and carriers are increasingly offering broader coverage forms and enhanced endorsements to address evolving insured needs. The marketplace is supported by a mix of experienced carriers, established MGAs, and newer MGA entrants, with Lloyd’s continuing to play a key role in providing capacity and innovation.
Demand for contamination and product recall coverage continues to rise across both food and non-food sectors. Despite favorable pricing conditions, claims activity remains a persistent challenge, placing pressure on underwriting and loss performance throughout the market.
The regulatory environment continues to evolve. While overall regulatory oversight appeared to loosen somewhat over the past year, certain regulatory authorities are tightening standards and placing greater emphasis on recallpreparedness and effectiveness, elevating the importance of proactive risk management and response planning.
Most carriers maintain a broad underwriting appetite, though select product classes remain more difficult to place. Cannabis, lithium-ion batteries, children’s products, and animal feed continue to attract heightened scrutiny, more restrictive terms, or reduced capacity due to elevated loss history and regulatory concerns.
PUBLIC ENTITY + EDUCATION
As in prior years, jurisdiction/venue and corresponding tort environment are what sets the casualty stage in public sector and education with market interest and terms and conditions responding accordingly. Professional lines remain an area of concern, with some carriers limiting capacity or excluding certain exposures, particularly within the law enforcement space. Conversely, excess casualty has seen improved interest, with more carriers willing to consider public sector and education risks. While most carriers continue to maintain a firm $5M maximum line, greater competition in tower construction has created opportunities to broaden coverage without a corresponding increase in overall program cost. Pricing relativity within layers has largely stabilized.
Sexual Abuse and Molestation (SAM) coverage continues to experience pressure due to the ongoing evolution of revival statutes. Many carriers remain unwilling to provide full retroactive coverage, resulting in increased complexity and underwriting caution in this segment.
Religious institutions present a distinct subset of the public entity and education market, characterized by complex exposures such as extensive volunteer involvement and diverse operational footprints. These factors continue to influence carrier appetite and placement strategy across the casualty marketplace.
The admitted market is contracting for religious institutions of all sizes, with carriers becoming increasingly selective. Package solutions offering total limits in the $5M–$15M range are less common, often requiring insureds to separate lines of coverage rather than securing a single comprehensive policy.
Demand for excess casualty and excess professional liability continues to rise, yet excess capacity has become more difficult to secure. Many carriers are unwilling to attach below $10M, creating challenges in placing $5M excess of $5M layers. Excess placements are also more complex, as carriers closely evaluate which underlying exposures theyare willing to support, including medical professional liability and security operations.
Rising claim severity and nuclear verdicts continue to drive cautious underwriting, increased pricing, and, in some cases, reduced limits. SAM coverage is frequently structured as a standalone tower, typically providing $5M–$10M in limits, further increasing overall program complexity for religious institutions.
REAL ESTATE – HABITATIONAL
The habitational real estate casualty market remains challenging in 2026, particularly for primary and lead excess placements, as carriers continue to apply heightened underwriting scrutiny to maintain profitability. Market dynamics that intensified in 2025, including lender-mandated coverage requirements, elevated submission volumes, and social inflation, continue to drive a selective underwriting environment. Success increasingly depends on early planning, strong risk management, and strategic program structure.
Lender requirements in 2025 frequently mandated liability programs silent on Assault & Battery (A&B), Firearms, Abuse & Molestation (SAM), and Animal Liability, often paired with higher excess limits. These mandates resulted in increased new, renewal, and midterm marketing activity as insureds sought compliant coverage. In response, carriersprioritized well-documented submissions supported by comprehensive schedule of location and values, multi-year loss runs, supplemental applications and detailed written security protocols.
In 2026, underwriting appetite remains cautious at the primary level, particularly for risks in jurisdictions with adverse loss trends or elevated crime scores, including Georgia, Florida, Texas, California, and New York. Loss severity driven by A&B claims, slip-and-fall exposures, and social inflation continues to pressure pricing and capacity at the ground-up level. However, above $5M in excess, the market has become more competitive, with pricing reductions available for well-managed accounts, absent poor loss history or unfavorable crime metrics.
For accounts unable to secure the required A&B or SAM limits within the GL market, CRC offers an exclusive A&B/SAM product providing an alternative solution to help insureds meet lender requirements without overburdening the primary liability placement. This flexibility has become increasingly important as carriers further restrict sub-limits or exclude these exposures altogether.
Looking ahead, insureds and brokers should clearly define coverage objectives early and determine whether coveragefor sensitive exposures is truly required. While lenders often request clean forms, waivers remain common, and misunderstanding requirements can lead to unnecessary remarketing and less favorable outcomes. Best-in-class submissions remain critical to navigating a competitive but selective market.
TRUCKING (PRIMARY, EXCESS, + GENERAL EXCESS TRANSPORTATION)
From a primary trucking perspective, market dynamics continue to evolve. Insurtech entrance into the space has moderated, while traditional carriers are increasingly emphasizing telematics; seeking integration of these tools into both fleet and non-fleet programs to enhance risk selection and loss control. Many carriers are shifting their focus from growth to profitability, resulting in a more disciplined and consistent approach to underwriting across the market. This heightened underwriting discipline is no longer limited to a small subset of carriers; rather, it has become a broadmarket trend. Insurers are refining underwriting parameters, pushing for rate adequacy, and applying stricter terms to keep up with loss and litigation trends. Adverse claims development remains a concern, with prior-year losses driving increased reserve strengthening. As a result, non-renewal activity over the past year has exceeded historical norms. Compounding these pressures, freight rates remain subdued due to reduced tonnage, in part driven by the impact of tariffs, further challenging insureds’ operating margins.
Group’s State of the Market at a Glancewas developed by surveying our nationwide network of industry specialists. Excess capacity in the trucking market remains tight in 2026, with little meaningful improvement from prior years.While the pace of rate increases has moderated, pricing remains firm, with most renewals seeing increases in the range of 5–8% though caution rates can be significantly higher based upon individual fleet size, type and individual loss experience. Insureds continue to explore alternative and “out-of-the-box” excess solutions due to pricing pressures and traditional capacity remains constrained.
Regional and venue-specific challenges persist. The Southeast remains a difficult market, with Texas and Georgiacontinuing to stand out as two of the most challenging jurisdictions. Several carriers have exited the state altogether or reduced available limits, commonly pulling back from $2M to $1M or even from $5M to $1M. Excess oilfield trucking remains under pressure as increased energy activity puts more trucks on the road, contributing to elevated loss frequency and severity.
Loss trends continue to drive underwriting discipline. Social inflation and the continued emergence of large verdictsand settlements, particularly in historically challenging and expanding venues, have reinforced carrier caution. Rates in the most adverse jurisdictions are increasing more rapidly, and the list of problematic venues continues to grow. Compounding this issue, actuarial analysis has been complicated by COVID-era court delays. Accident years from 2015 to 2019 have developed significantly worse than previously projected due to case backlogs from 2020–2021, leading carriers to reassess prior rate adequacy while more recent years are developing faster than expected.
Reinsurance availability and pricing remain a significant headwind. Continued reinsurance market exits fromexcess auto have contributed to both capacity constraints and upward pressure on pricing, further limiting carriers’ willingness to deploy limits. In response, carriers remain focused on risk differentiation, with telematics now often viewed as an expectation rather than a value-add. Underwriters increasingly rely on telematics data and individual insured response to this data to evaluate driver behavior, safety controls, and overall fleet management practices.
Interested in others?